Movie Review - Tron: Legacy

Tron was one of those movie that was revolutionary in the '80s. Everything having to do with computers was so new, and different, and a movie about a guy getting sucked into a computer blew everyone away. The movie is still an icon in geek pop culture, and now, Disney has come out with a sequel, starring two actors who weren't even born when the first one hit theaters. Can it be any good? The reviews haven't been nice, will I be any different? Sure, why not.

After the events of the first movie, Kevin Flynn had ambitions of building a perfect world inside the electronic "grid" he was abducted to in the first movie. After things go wrong, and he disappears, he leaves his son, Sam to inherit his empire. But when Sam is taken into his fathers world, he must figure away to get him, and his father out, before Clue, Flynn's clone uses the portal to invade the real world.

From the get-go you would be thinking the trailer shows a lot of style over substance, and you would assume the movie would be more of the same, right? Well, to a certain extent, you are correct. The movie didn't have the undertones the first movie had. This one had the undertones of a popcorn movie, so if you look at it that way, you'll see the movie like I did and you will have a blast.

The movie has some of the most amazing CG I have seen. The obvious show point is Jeff Bridges alter-ego, Clue. They used the same technology as Benjamin Button to show a young Jeff Bridges opposite the current (i.e. old) Jeff Bridges. The results are very impressive. While not perfect, there is a glimpse of amazing, with a slight flaw here and there, which really describes the entire movie. The light-cycle battle, the disc fighting, and the light planes are all a sight to see.

There were some quite amazing parts to this movie that weren't the special effects. One being the soundtrack, composed by Daft Punk, it is electric, and intoxicating and everything the grid is supposed to be. It's used to perfection, and it made me go right home and downl...uhh, buy the soundtrack right away. The other good part of the film were the performances. Of course Bridges is good as the old Flynn and the young Clue, which is impressive, but Olivia Wilde was also good. She captured the innocence of a child perfectly, while at the same time had the combat abilities of an action star. Garrett Hedlund, who played Sam was good, and consistent, but didn't quite compare to his talented co-stars.

While Tron: Legacy will be remembered for not quite living up to expectations in critics eyes, I will remember it as a dazzling, fun popcorn movie that should have appeared in the summer, but instead, warmed the winter up, if just a bit. It was a fun movie that I thoroughly enjoyed, and is a good companion to its predecessor.

Kevin Smith refuses to play media game

Kevin Smith is one of those odd directors. He's responsible for some amazing movies like Clerks and MallRats and Dogma and my personal favorite, Clerks 2. One of the reasons he's so well known and loved is because he, like so many New Jersey people, has no filter between his mouth and his brain, so you never have to worry if you're getting the whole truth from him or not. That being said, his latest battle has me thinking the guy isn't really thinking about what's best for him, despite making some good points.

With Smith's latest movie, Red State hitting theaters in March, most directors would be gearing up press junkets, sending out goodie bags to movie critics and trying to stir as much buzz as possible. Smith, not able to do things the old fashioned way is stirring buzz, alright, but it's because he isn't doing interviews, sending out press junkets or even screening the movie for critics. It stems from a feud Smith had with "stuffy movie critics" when his last movie Cop Out was panned. Now, Smith refuses to work with those critics.

“I’m not press-junketing at all, anywhere,” said Smith, adding that journalists will have to listen to hours of his Smodcast if they want to get any information about his film. He is, however, considering transcribing a Questions and Answers session for “SUPER lazy writers.” Basically, “nobody needs to talk to me anymore anyway, as anyone who’s curious can always know what I’m thinking 24/7 right here on Twitter.”

Now, I understand a certain disdain for some movie critics. There are those critics out there who feel they are entitled to free movies, and crazy amounts of ass-kissery. They think they have the power to make or break a movie, and as such, should be highly respected. Sadly, that isn't the case. While movie critics still wield power, with the internet, and the fact there is hundreds of thousands of people like me, the power is diminished.

That being said, being mad, and refusing to play ball because people said your movie sucked seems overly childish and silly. I hate those stuffy movie critics, which is why I always try to look at how entertaining a movie is. I don't care if it's silly, or stupid, but how good of a time I had at the movie. But, being pissed because the movie critic did their job, and just didn't like their movie doesn't mean you should hurt your next movie by not providing press junkets.

In the end, Smith will have his devoted fans, and they will all flock to his next movie, and they will love his twitter feed, and life will be merry. Meanwhile, everyone else in Hollywood is wondering if Smith is really smart or really dumb, and their leaning toward the "dumb."

Most Overrated? Is this a healthy list?

I read a blog daily called Cinematical, which has some incredibly talented writers. But on their website today, I saw a common topic being discussed, and that's the most overrated movies of 2010. As I said, I've seen a similar post on several websites, and was thinking of doing one here, but this one caught my eye, and caused me to stop thinking about doing a list at all.

Movies that the author considered overrated were movies like Toy Story 3, Shutter Island, and Kick Ass, to name a few. Now, I love to read peoples opinions, whether I agree with them or not, and this was no exception. I did, however, take issue with just slamming certain movies to cause a bit of controversy. While it's, sadly an accepted journalism practice, it's the slamming of movies that annoyed me. Basically, the author is saying that quite a few people liked these movies, and that they were wrong for that, and in some occasions, would list why; others, the author just stated they sucked.

I'm all for calling a horse a horse, or however the saying goes, and if you don't like a movie, you are welcome to say so, but an overrated movie list targets movies that often many people like and says they suck. While there are movies I do not enjoy, and don't seem to see the interest in, like, oh, say, Gone With the Wind, I can respect those opinions, and the movie itself as a good movie, and move on. I don't say they suck, nor do I say you are stupid for saying it's a good movie.

Sure there are movies that seem to get on the hype bandwagon and get blown way out of proportion, and before you know it, the hype is more about the hype than the movie, but don't tell me a movie is terrible, and expect me not to say "nuh uh." Movies are about opinion, and you're entitled to yours, just allow me to be entitled to mine, and don't make a list of movies that have people with wrong opinions.

What do you think? Overrated or not overrated?

Top Action movies of Oh 10!

I'm a huge action movie fan. While the Academy doesn't often recognize action movies, I find them a great way to unwind and let yourself go, and this year had some really great movies, some very large explosions, and some elements that really strained your brain. Check out my list of the top action movies of the year and let me know which ones you liked and which ones you didn't, and if there are any I forgot!

10) MacGruber
Despite the stigma of being a SNL movie, this movie was pretty funny. Sure, it had the same old stupid gags over and over again, but seeing MacGruber rip some throats out was awesome. Just fast-forward through anything with celery.

9) Salt
While I thought the plot was convoluted and silly, and the turns were stupidly predictable, I thought the action was quite entertaining. Angelina Jolie makes a fine action star, and she shows it off here. Sadly, it was the only thing showing off.

8) Scott Pilgrim
This movie was so much more than an action movie, but the action was stylized, beautiful and quite well done. Besides, ol’ Scotty pulls out a flaming sword for one boss battle and fights stunt doubles in another. Rating: Awesome.

7) Iron Man 2
The scene at Monaco Speedway was incredible. If the movies stopped there, it would probably still be on this list, but the movie added quite a bit more, including a thrilling end battle with more robots than you can count. It was glorious.

6) Red
Who knew old people could do an action movie? Not only did they do it, but it was enjoyable and funny and an all around good movie. Bruce Willis played himself, Helen Mirren could give James Bond a run for his money and John Malkovich had a gun in a pig. Yeah, this movie deserves it's spot on the list.

5) Inception
This is another movie that was so much more than just an action movie. This movie was beautiful, thought-provoking, and incredibly well written, but after the zero-gravity fight scene in the hall-way, this movie instantly shot up the list. That scene alone was incredible.

4) Kick Ass

There is one character that escalates this to the top of the list, and I bet no one would’ve guessed it would be a 14 year old Chloe Moretz. Hit Girl was amazing, had a huge body count, and swore like a sailor. She was easily the best character in the movie, and when you're going up against Nicolas Cage channeling Adam West, that's saying something.

3) Machete
Danny Trejo is Machete in the most ridiculously over the top movie of the year. At one point, Machete jumps out of the window and swings down to a lower window using a mans intestines. This is after he gets all the women. But don’t ask him to text.

2) Expendables
I said in my review that it was Man-Tastic, and that about describes it. There is so much testosterone in this movie, when your done, you better have a rag to clean off your TV. It was over the top, and had more explosions that Michael Bay’s fantasies, so of course, it’s worth your time.

1) A-Team
While this movie has the stigma of being a remake of an old TV show, this movie stands on its own with great performances by Bradley Cooper, Liam Neeson and Sharlto Copley in an over the top fun, action movie where despite billions of rounds fired, no one dies, but everyone has a good time. Oh, and they fly a friggin’ tank!

Doctor Who Series 6 teaser trailer -

The Doctor Who Christmas Special was incredible. I mean, really incredible. Like so incredible, the fact I have to wait until March is making me shed a Who-like tear. But, the only thing that is helping me get through this winter is the promise of an amazing spring, and this trailer promises something truly amazing.

WHAT?!? So, comments on the Stetson? Awesome! What is he running from? And why are the Yude back? And, it looks like River Song gets a bit less mysterious!

Does going to the theater really suck?

So, I stumbled upon a blog today from a blog that describes itself as "Film news and opinions from a Film Snob." The title of the article was "A difficult Conversation, or Why going to the movies kind of sucks." In the article, the self-proclaimed film snob said she had defended going to the movies before, but after several trips that included loud people, text messages, and a sandwich, she has come to the conclusion that going to the movies sucks, and you should, if your a film snob, watch them at home.

First off, I don't profess to being a movie snob, nor a music snob, nor a beer snob, or any other kind of snob. I believe at the top of my humble little blog, it uses the phrase "movie geek," mainly because, as described in Doctor Who, a geek is one who is obsessed over a subject material. I don't pretend to know everything, nor do I think my opinions of movies, or even the genre of movie is better than any other.

But, I digress a bit. This post is about whether going to the movies sucks, and I say 'nay.' I love going to the movies. I average a trip or two a week, and I love it. Sure, I despise the text messagers, or the people who sound like they're losing a battle to the Greek legion behind me, and of course, if someone picks up the phone, I'm contemplating how to hide the body, but at the same time, it's part of the experience. Film is meant to be shared with other people. Otherwise, it's just sad. I love sharing movies and experiences with people. Lately, I've realized this more as I sit down to see a movie with my girlfriend that she's never seen. I'm able to see it again for the first time thanks to her, and we are usually better off because of it.

So, does going to the movies suck? Apparently, only if your a movie snob, because I love the popcorn, the excitement and the sharing of an experience with an entire audience of strangers. I guess I'm just old fashioned, or just a movie geek.

What are your thoughts on the matter?

Box Office Breakdown - Little Fockers wins Christmas

Little Fockers took in a medium haul for Christmas weekend at $34 million, giving it the top spot. I wasn't a fan of the film, as you can read in my review, but there was no doubt it would take the top spot. True Grit, which came in second, gave the Coen Brothers their highest opening weekend ever, and the film comes close to covering it's $38 million budget. Tron Legacy was a bit disappointing in third, with $20.1 million, bringing the total to $88.3 million. The film had a budget of $150, so, it could be tough to make back if this week isn't good for the film.

So, overall, a mild Christmas movie week. Did you see any of these? What did you think?


BOX OFFICE TOP TEN
1. Little Fockers - $34.0 million ($48.3 million total)
2. True Grit - $25.6 million ($36.8 million total)
3. Tron Legacy - $20.1 million ($88.3 million total)
4. The Chronicles of Narnia: The Voyage of the Dawn Treader - $10.8 million ($63.9 million total)
5. Yogi Bear - $8.8 million ($36.8 million total)
6. The Fighter - $8.5 million ($27.6 million total)
7. Gulliver's Travels - $7.2 million ($7.2 million total)
8. Black Swan - $6.6 million ($29.0 million total)
9. Tangled - $6.1 million ($143.8 million total)
10. The Tourist - $5.7 million ($41.2 million total)

Merry Christmas Movie Geeks!!

Christmas for me is not neccesarily about religeon. For me, it's a time to spend a great evening with friends, family and loved ones. It's also the one time of the year it's encouraged to be nice to people, and it's a great time to watch Christmas movies. That being said, I wish everyone a very merry Christmas. I hope you can spend time with your loved ones and share some happiness with someone. That's what Christmas means to me.

That being said, here's a couple of Christmas movies I can reccomend.

Die Hard - It's a Christmas movie, a darn good one, too. And who doesn't like John McClaine?
National Lampoon's Christmas Vacation - Because Chevy Chase is just so darn funny.
Santa Clause - Because it captures the Christmas mood really well, and it's my girlfriends favorite.
Elf - How can you not love this movie?
Rudolph the Rednosed Reindeer - This is just a classic. It's one that can capture the youthfull innocence of a childs Christmas.
Charlie Brown Christmas - A great Christmas movie that talks about the true meaning of Christmas.
The Ref - Dennis Leary and Kevin Spacey. Can it get any better?

Merry Christmas!!!

Fringe/Firefly mashup

I admit it, I'm a bit obsessed with anything Firefly. I can't help it. It's my favorite show of all time, and it was canceled way before they could do things other shows did; ya know, have crappy episodes. So, when this video came up with a mix of Fox's Fringe and Firefly, I couldn't help but be excited. They did this because Fringe got moved to Friday's at 8 pm, which Firefly shared for a brief time, before, like every other show, was canceled because no one watches TV on Fridays.

So, with that said, here it is. Enjoy!

Should Indy go to the tomb in the sky?

There are some serious rumors today about what Harrison Ford has said is in store for the next Indiana Jones flick. Yes, there are rumors of another Indiana Jones, but the surprise is that Ford allegedly wants to kill of Indy. I know!

Apparently, George Lucas doesn't particularly like the idea, but Steven Spielberg kinda does. It puts things into a pickle a bit, but the last film strongly hinted at the idea of a passing of the torch to Shia LeBeuf's character. When the torch never actually got passed, it seemed like one of the films many flaws, but are they going to fix that in this film? The better question is should they?

I don't know about you, but I grew up on Indy and his legendary adventures. He was a hero, and a truly memorable one. I bet right now, you could quote atleast five lines, and everyone can recognize the theme song. So, how devastating would it be to see the hero die? And don't tell me I am going to find comfort in the arms of Shia, because, as much as I like him, it just doesn't work here. So, no, I don't think he should die. I could see a reboot of the series, or another film without Indy in it, but not a scene depicting his death. I just don't think I could handle it.

What do you think? Another movie is more than likely in the works, so how would you have them handle it?

Box Office Report - Tron: Legacy strikes gold

It's no surprise Tron: Legacy took the top spot. The Disney sequel had high expectations, and with less than stellar reviews, it could be tough to recoup the $170 million budget. The big surprise comes for the number 2 spot; Yogi Bear. While family movies always do well, this just had "crap" written all over it, and even though executives were hoping for better, in an attempt to make back the $80 million budget, I'm just surprised it did that much.

So, did you see any of these? What do you think about this weekend's successes and failures?

BOX OFFICE TOP TEN
1. Tron Legacy - $43.6 million ($43.6 million total)
2. Yogi Bear - $16.7 million ($16.7 million total)
3. The Chronicles of Narnia: The Voyage of the Dawn Treader - $12.4 million ($42.8 million total)
4. The Fighter - $12.2 million ($12.6 million total)
5. The Tourist - $8.7 million ($30.8 million total)
6. Tangled - $8.7 million ($127.8 million total)
7. Black Swan - $8.3 million ($15.7 million total)
8. How Do You Know - $7.6 million ($7.6 million total)
9. Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Part I - $4.8 million ($265.5 million total)
10. Unstoppable - $1.8 million ($77.3 million total)

Movie Review - True Grit (2010)

There is always a stigma when Hollywood remakes a classic movie. The comparison between the original, which is always far superior, compared to the new one is often cruel, with talks about the originality of Hollywood sure to ensue. Well, not here, and not with the remake of the John Wayne movie True Grit. This movie stands on its own, and is a surprise, considering Hollywood's history, or even the state of westerns in Hollywood.

True Grit starts with Hailee Steinfeld's Mattie talking about how her honest father was killed by a dishonest criminal, played by Josh Brolin. Mattie seeks justice for the murder of her father, and at 14 years old, knows she must find someone with true grit to go seek the outlaw and get justice. She comes across Rooster Cogburn, played by Jeff Bridges. Once on the trail, they bump into a Texas Ranger named LaBoeuf, played by Matt Damon. The three go on the hunt for the convict, and all three discover their true grit.

Every actor had some serious shoes to fill, and even if you don't compare to the original movie starring the greatest western actor ever, you still have a huge weight on the genre of westerns. Let's face it, there haven't been too many good westerns since Tombstone. Fortunately, Bridges steps up to deliver a great performance as an aging Marshall who is as tough as they come. One scene involves Bridges in a courtroom talking about the many men he killed, which was hilarious, but the film does a great job of contrasting it with another scene later on, where the Marshall faces down several men and refuses to back down.

The other surprise is Hailee Steinfeld. I hadn't seen her before, and the strength she delivers in her character, mixed with the sadness of her deceased father is really well portrayed. It's clear we can expect more good things from Ms. Steinfeld. If there is one slightly less powerful performance, however, it comes from Damon's Texas Ranger. While he may have true grit, he comes off more as a bit silly, and more comedic than rugged west toughened. I won't even bring up the accent.

The movie truly felt like it was shot to be a real western, with beautiful landscapes, well shot action scenes that don't have the over abundance of cuts you see in other action movies, and a focus on more of the characters, than anything else. This movie seemed to capture that wild west feeling you get from those classic John Wayne and Clint Eastwood movies without all the poor resolution, and as a result, it's a treat to feast your eyes on.

With all that said, if I have to give one gripe, it would be that the movie starts off fairly slow. It's a great way to build up the character of Mattie, who is really the star of the movie, but I was expecting more Jeff Bridges than anything else. While the second act clearly makes up for it, the first takes a bit to get going.

Overall, if you like westerns, you will love this movie. It isn't the light, popcorn friendly blockbuster you got during the summer, this is a cold, tough movie that has true grit (alright, that's the last time I will use that phrase) and will leaving you applauding for everyone involved.

EDITORS NOTE: This also appeared on SpoilerTV's site HERE and also on Creative Loafing's website HERE.

Movie Review - Little Fockers

After we met the parents, and we met the Fockers, we are on to the third chapter of Greg Focker (Ben Stiller) versus his father-in-law, Jack Byrnes (Robert DeNiro). The third chapter involves kids, all the parents and the coming together of a family. But, can it recreate the magic of the first movie? You should read on, but I bet you can guess what I'm going to say.

The movie picks up with Greg juggeling his family with the stress of work, and raising two kids while maintaining a relationship with his wife. Sounds funny so far, right? We finally see Jack come back into Greg's life in the only way he can, as he wants to make Greg the patriarch of the family, or the "Godfocker," as long as he can prove he can lead like Jack does. What follows is Jack and Greg dueling, DeNiro's boner, Jessica Alba being kinda annoying and plenty of "focker" jokes.

I loved the first movie; and why not? There's plenty to love with the first movie. The second movie added two fun characters to the same formula, and the third went back to the same formula, only to add some kids. The point is, it's the same formula, just watered down with extra characters, and more of the same jokes. Now, if you really liked the formula, there will be something left for you to enjoy. For me, it felt like when I hear a friend of mine say the same joke over and over again. The first couple times you laugh, but by the third time, you just grow weary.

There were some good parts to the movie. I think Greg has grown into more than a screw-up; he's a real man, with real issues; kids and a lot to juggle. I like how he's developed, and has become an equal to Jack. I also liked any scene with Greg's parents, played by Barbra Streisand and Dustin Hoffman. While there weren't a lot of scenes, there were a few good ones. The other good scenes were visable in the trailer, like Jack's boner and the chemistry between Stiller and DeNiro. Sadly, there wasn't many other funny parts left for the film.

Sure, there was the classic duel between Stiller and DeNiro, which reached epic proportions in this film, and there were scenes making fun of poop jokes, and blood, and how the word "focker" sounds like something else, but in the end, I would've felt ripped off using my whole paycheck to pay for this movie.

How I learned to stop worrying and love Jon Favreau

Big news going around the interwebs today includes Jon Favreau reportedly telling Marvel he wouldn't do another Iron Man movie. Reasons range from Marvel being too cheap to afford the sought-after director to Marvel forcing Favreau into making the second one, to Favreau being pissed he wasn't given the Avengers job. Either way, you shouldn't worry. Here's why:

Iron Man 3 isn't confirmed. Not only have there been no mentions of Marvel wanting a third Iron Man, but they have mentioned they have to do Thor, Captain America: The First Avenger, and finally, The Avengers movies first. As a result, they aren't even thinking Iron Man just yet. Besides, financially, Marvel needs to rake in the dough on the next three movies, or they simply won't be able to do a major blockbuster film like Iron Man. So, with the film's future more than up in the air, it's reasonable for the director to not have any plans for such a movie until the contract is signed.

It's all about the Washington's. Favreau is a smart guy, and a fantastic director. He made two great movies with the previous Iron Man films, and looks to repeat with Cowboys vs. Aliens in 2011. The guy is one of the top directors in the industry right now, and signing with a company that paid him pretty poorly for the second movie is silly. It's better to say 'no,' and wait for Marvel to come to him with a smarter bid. While he may be a fanboy at heart, he still has to be compensated.

There's some good directors out there. Seriously. I love Favreau. His energy and excitement is genuine, and very contagious, but there are other directors that can do more than an average job. So, no complaining unless they hire someone terrible to pick up Iron Man after the Avengers flick.

So, now you don't have to worry, you may go about your business. Before you do, what do you think about this Favreau business? Use the comments section, it's what that box is for!

Twitter's top Twatted movies of oh 10

Twitter has become quite the rage, despite it's 140 character good-for-nothing-ness. With that being said, /Film has a list of the top 10 most twatted movies of oh 10, and I have to say, it's not a bad list.

1. Inception
2. Harry Potter and The Deathly Hallows
3. Scott Pilgrim vs. the World
4. Despicable Me
5. Karate Kid
6. The Last Airbender
7. The Twilight Saga: Eclipse
8. The Expendables
9. The Chronicles of Narnia
10. Paranormal Activity 2

What do you think? Does this do a pretty good job of your top 10 movies of oh 10? Look for my list coming soon!

2010 Golden Globe nominations

Check out the Golden Globe nominations for this year. There are a few surprises in there; some pleasant, some not so much. Some Inception love is a good thing, and there is quite a bit of hype for The Fighter and Black Swan, the latter of which was no surprise. But Burlesque and The Tourist love? That's more than a surprise. Both movies tanked horribly, and have extremely low ratings on Rotten Tomatoes, leaving me wondering why they are there. And, congratulations to Emma Stone for her nomination in Easy A. Clearly, there are some good things in store for her.

The winners will be announced January 16th, with the ceremony being hosted once again by Ricky Gervais.

What do you think of this years list?

BEST PICTURE: DRAMA

Black Swan
The Fighter
Inception
The King’s Speech
The Social Network

BEST PICTURE: COMEDY OR MUSICAL
Alice in Wonderland
Burlesque
The Kids Are Alright
Red
The Tourist

BEST DIRECTOR
Darren Aronosfsky, Black Swan
David Fincher, The Social Network
Tom Hooper, The King’s Speech
Christopher Nolan, Inception
David O. Russell, The Fighter

BEST ACTOR: DRAMA
Jesse Eisenberg, The Social Network
Colin Firth, The King’s Speech
James Franco, 127 Hours
Ryan Gosling, Blue Valentine
Mark Wahlberg, The Fighter

BEST ACTRESS: DRAMA
Halle Berry, Frankie and Alice
Nicole Kidman, Rabbit Hole
Jennifer Lawrence, Winter’s Bone
Natalie Portman, Black Swan
Michelle Williams, Blue Valentine

BEST ACTRESS: COMEDY OR MUSICAL
Anette Bening, The Kids Are Alright
Anne Hathaway, Love and Other Drugs
Angelina Jolie, The Tourist
Julianne Moore, The Kids Are Alright
Emma Stone, Easy A

BEST ACTOR: COMEDY OR MUSICAL
Johnny Depp, Alice in Wonderland
Johnny Depp, The Tourist
Paul Giamatti, Barney’s Version
Jake Gyllenhaal, Love and Other Drugs
Kevin Spacey, Casino Jack

BEST SUPPORTING ACTRESS
Amy Adams, The Fighter
Helena Bonham Carter, The King’s Speech
Mila Kunis, Black Swan
Melissa Leo, The Fighter
Jackie Weaver, Animal Kingdom

BEST SUPPORTING ACTOR
Christian Bale, The Fighter
Michael Douglas, Wall Street 2: Money Never Sleeps
Andrew Garfield, The Social Network
Jeremy Renner, The Town
Geoffrey Rush, The King’s Speech

BEST FOREIGN LANGUAGE FILM
Biutiful
The Concert
The Edge
I Am Love
In a Better World

BEST SCREENPLAY
Danny Boyle and Simon Beaufoy, 127 Hours
Lisa Cholodenko and Stuart Blumberg, The Kids Are All Right
Christopher Nolan, Inception
David Seidler, The King’s Speech
Aaron Sorkin, The Social Network

BEST ORIGINAL SCORE
Alexandre Desplat, The King’s Speech
Danny Elfman, Alice in Wonderland
A.R. Rahman, 127 Hours
Trent Reznor and Atticus Ross, The Social Network
Hans Zimmer, Inception

BEST ANIMATED FEATURE FILM
Despicable Me
How to Train Your Dragon
The Illusionist
Tangled
Toy Story 3

BEST ORIGINAL SONG
“Bound To You” (Burlesque)
“Coming Home” (Country Strong)
“I See The Light” (Tangled)
“There’s a Place For Us” (The Chronicles of Narnia)
“You Haven’t Seen The Last of Me” (Burlesque)

Pirates of the Caribbean on Stranger Tides Trailer

Despite my total adoration of the first three movies, I haven't been super excited about the fourth movie coming out May 4 of 2011. It could be because I haven't heard too much about it. Until now.

How awesome is this trailer? We have the classic soundtrack in the background, plenty of Captain Jack Sparrow, Penelope Cruz looking hot, a shot of Keith Richards playing Jacks father and Geoffrey Rush returning as Captain Barbosa. If that weren't enough, we have the new bad guy in Blackbeard, played by Ian McShane. Sign me up, because I'm officially excited!

What do you think of the trailer?

New Comedy Central Logo

Recently, Comedy Central announced a logo change. I'm not sure why, but we got it anyway, and I've got it for you. Prepare to be underwhelmed. I would have to say this has to be up there with the Sci-Fi channel changing its name to Syfy.

So, there it is. What do you think?

Transformers: Dark of the Moon Teaser Trailer

Well, it's out, the teaser for the third Transformers flick. You will notice it doesn't have any of the human actors we've come to know and...well, that we've come to know. It seems to be going back to it's roots with the first film, and the effective teaser for that. I think it's a good idea to not bring up the drama surrounding the casting for the third flick and focus on what matters the most; big friggin' robots.

Check it out and let me know what you think!

Chistopher Nolan's Inception map - SPOILERS

Inception was one of my favorite films of the year. It was incredibly complex, and even after multiple viewings, I still struggle to wrap my head around the plot. Here's how director Christopher Nolan kept track of it.

George Lucas plays God

There are perhaps some who wouldn't be surprised by that headline, and there are some who say he is God, and some that just say Star Wars director George Lucas is a moron. The latest rumor surrounding the famous director may strengthen your belief, whichever one you choose.

There is a rumor going around that Lucas is buying up the rights to famous deceased actors so he can digitally recreate them and place them on screen with some of today's famous actors. The question is, is this a brilliant idea that is the next evolution in film, or is it sacrilege.

As a movie geek, I admit I would love to see John Wayne on screen with The Rock, and Sylvester Stallone in an Expendables: Generations movie, or how amazing it would be for Humphrey Bogart to seduce Angelina Jolie. I mean, that's pretty amazing, right? If Avatar taught us anything, it's that technology is getting to the point where it's not only possible, it's looking beautiful.

My movie geekery aside, if there was a deceased loved one on screen; their likeness being used to make stupid amounts of money, I would be pretty upset, and even if I never knew them, I think it would be more than startling to see a deceased actor just walk on to the screen like nothing happened. Would it take me out of the movie? Absolutely.

So, what do you think? Is it ethically wrong? Would you see the movie? And, who would you like to see Lucas resurrect?

The top 10 of Oh 10

As we chill the champagne and ready the fireworks for another end of year celebration, you can't help but look back on the year that was. This year was a rough year for movie goers, with a whole lot of movies that were good, but not memorable. While I make no claim this is the difinitive end-all best list of 2010, these are the ones I was able to see this year that stuck with me. I know other movie lists like Roger Ebert and the American Film Institute are hailing movies like Black Swan and The Fighter to be at the top of the list, but since I haven't seen them yet, this is what you get. Maybe there will be revisions in the future, but we'll see.

Honorable Mention go to Piranha 3-D for its creative use of 3-D, and it's rediculous, over the top shennanigans, including a scene with Ving Rhames and an outboard motor.

10) Unstoppable - This movie was one of the big surprise sleeper hits of the year. It stars Denzel Washington and Star Trek's Chris Pine in a movie about a runaway train. While it seems simple enough, it's the steady increase of tension that leaves you on the edge of your seat throughout the entire movie, making you forget it's just about a runaway train. This was an excellent movie that I will enjoy watching again.

9) The Crazies - This year's great zombie movie, this one stars Timothy Olyphant as a sherriff in a small town that gets infected by a disease, turning everyone into killers. This movie had so much tension in so many scenes, I was exhausted in the end. I think, while some people may have forgotten about this film, they shouldn't; it's one of the better zombie movies out there.

8) Alice in Wonderland - This was Tim Burton's take on the classic tale, and where there's Burton, there's Johnny Depp. This movie was brilliant in that it was sort of a remake, and sort of a sequel, without the issues of either. It was beautifully done, and well acted by all. The only reason it isn't higher is that I'm getting a bit weary of Burton's style, which seems eerily similar in every movie.

7) Iron Man 2 - Robert Downey Jr. is back as Tony Stark, which is the best bit of casting this decade. While the movie had some incredible set pieces, some great characters, and some good acting in Downey, Don Chealde and Sam Rockwell, it suffered from too many characters to balance. It was a great movie, but didn't quite have the lightning in a bottle the first had.

6) Kick Ass - The movie was quite controversial with the character that had the highest body count being a 14 year old Chloe Moretz. Moretz was incredible as a swearing hit-girl in a movie that showed why people don't actually become a super hero. And who knew Nicolas Cage could do such a good Adam West impression?

5) Scott Pilgrim vs. The World - This movie was like jumping into a video game all Tron style. The movie was structured like a video game with progressive battles leading to a boss battle, accompanied with a great soundtrack, and some really good perfomances, this is the amazing movie that will be a cult classic that no one saw in theaters.

4) Shutter Island - Martin Scorcese and Leonardo DiCaprio in a movie that felt dark and cold. The movie was beautiful, with, in my opinion, an academy award winning perfomance by DiCaprio. While the twist was obvious to me from the trailer, the end still left me in awe.

3) True Grit - The Coen Brothers made a movie that had tons of true grit, with Jeff Bridges taking over the role made iconic by John Wayne, and he made me question which one I liked better. Hailee Steinfeld blew me away with a terriffic performance as Maddie. This movie was beautiful and a true western, which is way over due.

2) Toy Story 3 - A beautiful, animated movie that had more heart than most live action movies this year. It was a fitting end to a beautiful trilogy, and left us wanting more from Woddy, Buzz and the gang. You had to root for this movie, and this movie actually met those expectations it set.

1) Inception - The best movie I've seen this year. For me, this movie had it all. It was bigger than life, it was beautifully done, it had some great action, including a zero-G hallway scene that literally made my jaw drop, some good performances in Leonardo DiCaprio and Marion Cotillard, and a brilliant script with an ending that left everyone wanting to discuss exactly what happened. Christopher Nolan solidified his standing as one of the top directors in Hollywood with this film.

/Film video: http://blastr.com/2010/12/iron-man-2-inception-and.php

800 posts? Dude, get a life

Yeah, I know that's what you are thinking. TheHopp.NET hasn't been about the audience, it doesn't have the high traffic, it's just one guy blogging about movies. I've been blessed enough to have a couple of really amazing fans, including my parents, my wonderful girlfriend Jasandra and my sister, who has been a fan since post #1.

So, to all of you, thank you.

I promise, as I get more and more experience, the writing will get better and better. I know why I blog; because it's what I do, and I enjoy it. I hope you enjoy reading as much as I enjoy the writing, and stay tuned for more movies news....

IMDB cranks the Ratings to 11

WTF News of the week - Hugh Jackman as CAPTAIN Jack Sparrow?

As Johnny Depp was talking about his infamous role of Captain Jack Sparrow, he talked about how originally, Disney didn't like his interpretation of the Pirates of the Caribbean character, and they thought Depp portrayed him as gay. He also let it slip he wasn't Disney's first choice.

According to the article on Yahoo!'s website, Disney originally went after Wolverine star Hugh Jackman for the role. I will let that sink in for a second. ... Alright, do you have that mental picture in your head? Yeah, me neither. It shows you how good Depp is that you can't picture anyone else in his now iconic role.

I could see why Disney wouldn't like Depp's Jack Sparrow. The guy is a perfect pirate, very unscrupulous and has very little virtues. He's the perfect pirate, but looking back to all the other Disney characters in history, how many could you say have none, or very little virtue? It's clearly not in Disney's mold, so I could see why they would question it. But, in the end, it's one of the reasons the character works.

Craig Ferguson and The Doctor

A week or so ago, Craig Ferguson had the Doctor himself, Matt Smith on the show. After hours of rehearsal, they planned a musical number, and right before they did it, they were informed they had not secured the rights to the Doctor Who theme song. As a result, this performance never aired. Ferguson had said it would be a crying shame if it ever leaked online, and if he ever caught the person that did it, they would be ... promoted. So, here it is, in its epicness.

Film terminology 101

So, I haven't done one of these in awhile, but I found a term I had to look up, so I figured I would share the wealth.

First off, bête noire - It literally means "Black Beast" and is used as an object in film that is of particular dislike to the audience. A good example I read today was Bruce the Shark in Jaws.

Next, Film Noir - It's a term used primarily to describe stylish Hollywood crime dramas, particularly those that emphasize cynical attitudes and sexual motivations. Hollywood's classic film noir period is generally regarded as stretching from the early 1940s to the late 1950s. Film noir of this era is associated with a low-key black-and-white visual style that has roots in German Expressionist cinematography.

I don't know if I've done that one before, but there it is. The perfect modern example would be Brick.

Another one for you potential film geeks: Jump Cut -An instantaneous cut from one action to another, at first seemingly unrelated, action. Jump cuts will usually call attention to themselves because of the abrupt change in time and/or place.

I'm sure you can think of a film or two regarding this one: Neorealism - A film style using documentary techniques for fictional purposes. Most neorealist films rely on high-contrast black-and-white film, nonprofessional actors, and natural settings. Neorealism began as a movement among a group of filmmakers in Italy after World War II. *cough Blair Witch cough*

So, there you have it. Some film terminology to brighten your day. Now, what other website could you go to where you learn stuff too? No..not that one....oh, yeah, I forgot about that one.....ok, nevermind!

Heath Ledgers Joker to cameo in Batman 3?

I've read multiple articles now over a rumor regarding the appearance of Heath Ledger's Joker in the third Batman film. The rumor is that director Christopher Nolan wants a bit of continuity between the second and third films, and as a result, could use archived and CGI footage to give the Joker a cameo in the third film. Is this insulting, or a good move by a wise director?

You will never hear me question Nolan on a decision because with his films, it's clear he deserves the benefit of the doubt. He's also way smarter than I am, so IF the rumor is true, and that is his decision, than fine. But, currently, Cinematical is reporting that the rumor is false, so all this speculation could be for nothing.

But, would you have a problem with the move if there was a mention or a cameo? My personal opinion, and that's all that it is, an opinion, is that as long as it doesn't turn into a way to exploit the late actor, then it's fine. But, if they have pictures of the Joker on the poster, or mention Ledger's name, then it's simply for exploitation, which is what I would have issue with. But, I wouldn't mind as Batman is fighting criminals in Archam Asylum, you see the Joker in the distance, showing a bit of a plotting look or something. That's all it would have to be, and it would give me shivers.

What do you think? Is that role taboo?

Anne Hathaway and James Franco to host 2011 Oscars

It was announced today Anne Hathaway (Love and other Drugs, Get Smart) and James Franco (Spiderman, Pineapple Express) would be hosting the 2011 Oscars. It's a move that could be brilliant, considering the demos for last years Oscars heavily favored the older crowd with Steve Martin and Alec Baldwin hosting. Clearly, they're trying to add a younger audience with the two sexy stars. But, will it be a smart idea?

The formula for the Oscars usually favor a comedienne like Billy Crystal or Whoopi Goldberg, or Johnny Carson, Robin Williams or last years tag team of Martin and Baldwin. It's been done before with Hugh Jackman hosting the 81st Academy Awards show, which I thought was good, but this is two inexperienced hosts hosting the biggest night in Hollywood, and while both are incredibly talented and like able, I am wondering if they're experience will shine through, or will it make for an awkward 15 hour show.

The other issue is that both actors could conceivably be up for an award. Franco should be a lock for his portrayal in 127 Hours, while Hathaway could benefit from the lack of female star power and get a nod for Love and Other Drugs. How awkward would that be to have to present a trophy to themselves, or worse, someone else. I guess it's a good problem to have, but an issue, nonetheless.

What do you think, is this a good move? Will you tune in this year?

RIP Leslie Nielsen

By now, everyone has heard the news of the passing of one of cinema's greats, Leslie Nielsen. Generally, they are accompanied by quotes from so many of his movies; a reference to not calling him Shirley, and a sad smile, signifying a longing for the great cinematic personality.

Nielsen was born in Canada in February of 1926 and died November 28 from complications of Pneumonia. He is survived by his fourth wife Barbaree and two Thea and Maura.

He was best known for his comedy roles in movies like Airplane or the movies based on the TV show, Naked Gun: From the Files of Police Squad. He also did tons of other comedies, like one of my favorites, Spy Hard, and he's famous for delivering hilarious lines, and side-splitting prose with a deadpan straight face. It always amazed me Nielsen could say the things he said like his life depended on it.

It may surprise some that before Airplane, Nielsen did quite a bit of serious work, including some stage work and serious roles in movies like The Poseidon Adventure and Forbidden Planet. Before that, he was a radio announcer, and before that, served in the Royal Canadian Airforce. Nielsen was clearly a man of many talents, and it almost seems a shame we remember him for not wanting to be called Shirley.

For me, my favorite Nielsen moment comes from Airplane, where he gives Ted Stryker the "win one for the Zipper" speech, but it's so hard to narrow it down to one.

Yahoo! has some of the five most memorable moments of the stars life HERE for your viewing pleasure, but they don't do the star justice.

Rest in peace, Leslie Nielsen!

What's your favorite Leslie Nielsen moment?

Box Office Report - Harry Potter beats Tangled

It's the weekend of the family movies, or, rather, Harry Potter and the family movies. The seventh Potter movie dropped an average 60% to rake in $50.4 million, beating out the Zachary Levi and Mandy Moore voiced animated film Tangled, which did a respectable $49.1 million. Megamind is still doing strong in third place. Faster premiered in seventh, with a dismal $8.7 million.

What did you see this weekend?

BOX OFFICE TOP TEN
1. Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Part I - $50.4 million ($220.4 million total)
2. Tangled - $49.1 million ($69.0 million total)
3. Megamind - $12.9 million ($130.5 million total)
4. Burlesque - $11.8 million ($17.2 million total)
5. Unstoppable - $11.8 million ($60.7 million total)
6. Love and Other Drugs – $9.9 million (14.0 million total)
7. Faster - $8.7 million ($12.2 million)
8. Due Date - $7.3 million ($85.0 million total)
9. The Next Three Days - $4.8 million ($14.6 million total)
10. Morning Glory - $4.0 million ($26.5 million total)

Kevin Smith to retire?

Kevin Smith is one of the more known filmmakers in Hollywood. He's known for making some incredible, honest, funny movies, and his outgoing attitude towards his fans. He's currently working on a movie called Red State, and after a brutal battle with critics after his last movie, Cop Out, he's not all that happy with movie critics. He's got some truly interesting ideas for distribution on Red State, though.

Overall, I hope Smith doesn't retire. He's a breath of fresh air with his honesty. Whether you agree with his opinions or not, which I don't, you have to respect him coming right out, sans sugar. So, check out what he told to /Film regarding the whole thing.

This isn’t news. Y’know what is news? That RED STATE podcast – and we give it away every week FOR FREE. Y’know what else is news? That Richard Kelly podcast. That’s one INSANELY juicy and useful document if you’ve ever been interested in making a film, or even if you’ve just wondered about the vagaries of the movie biz.

But THIS “retirement” crap? Not news so much as another sad example of how fucking lazy movie pr ess has become: they cannibalize stories by other writers just to have something to post on their own blogs. Yours was the only website that bothered to go DIRECTLY to the source, Peter – other cats ran articles without even tossing a Tweet my way to check veracity. And I answer Tweets like I answer the dinner bell: often & much. While sweating. And already eating something else.

I’ve always said (since CLERKS, even) that I’ve got about ten films in me (that info might even be on my Wikipedia page). And COP OUT notwithstanding (solely because I didn’t write it), HIT SOMEBODY is the 10th film I’ve got in me. At this moment in time, I’ve got no other flicks I wanna make. The musing about a possible return visit to the View Askewniverse with a third CLERKS is something I’ve been doing since CLERKS II, but I’ve always opened said musings with the disclaimer “If I ever wanna make a flick about being in my 40′s, I’ll think of Da nte & Randal first.” There are no concrete plans for a CLERKS III.

The author of the Boston Phoenix piece did a really nice job of not hyping that throwaway factoid in the article and turning it into the exact piece of specious bullshit “news” the websites you mentioned are trying to create of it.

You want REAL Kevin Smith news? Listen to HOLLYWOOD BABBLE-ON tomorrow morning and I’ll tell you who the lead in HIT SOMEBODY is gonna be. Or download the RED STATE OF THE UNION podcast this Tuesday and find out what actors passed on the flick! THAT shit’s Kevin Smith news, son!

But if you can’t wait ’til then? If you’ve GOTTA have some Kevin Smith news to hold you over? Here’s something that’s not so much news as my stated intentions for RED STATE: if it gets into Sundance, my plan is to pick the RED STATE distributor right there – IN THE ROOM – auction style. Might even bring up a professional auctioneer to make it fun and unintelligible. And if you’re a multi-millionaire who can’t make it to the first screening of RED STATE, fear not: maybe we’ll set up an eBay page for the post-screening bid-calling as well.

See? With a little diligence on a newsie’s behalf, not only did he get to the bottom of his story, he got some exclusive shit nobody else has as well! And it’s not like Peter’s got a secret line to me. I’m WAY reachable. I’m so tired of doing lazy fucker’s jobs FOR them – especially when they’re the same lazy fuckers who’re screaming “YOUR MOVIE SUCKS!” a month later anyway. Some of your peers need to act a little less entitled and a little more Sciretta.

Harry Potter plays Daniel Radcliffe

In one of the funniest interviews I've ever seen, we see Daniel Radcliffe confess that he is actually Harry Potter, and that he only plays an actor named Dan. Apparently, Dan is a fun character to play. This is a hilarious video. Thanks Funny Or Die!

I Am Harry Potter from Daniel Radcliffe

Movie Review - Harry Potter and the Deathly Hollows Part 1

The series taken from the beloved children's books and adapted into the biggest movie franchise in history is coming to a close with Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part 1. As sides clash, characters embrace their destiny and studios rake in the dough, we get the feeling something special is ending. So, where does the seventh Harry Potter movie rank in the series?

The second movie picks up some time after the events of the previous film, with the gravity of the situation in full force as the Minister of Magic (Bill Nighy) tries to convince everyone, including himself that everything is ok. As a result, Harry's relatives pack up and leave; Hermoine leaves her parents, making them forget their daughter ever existed, and Ron is left contemplating whether his family will make it out alive as they gather for a wedding.

Once we get the intro, we are treated to one of the best action scenes in franchise history as Harry's friends try to transport their most valuable cargo to a safer location. Things go terribly wrong; brooms fly, and good and evil do battle in the skies as Harry tries to get away in Hagrid's side car. This was my favorite part of the movie with some great scenes, and gorgeous action shots. We get a quick lull in the action before another death eater attack leaves Hermoine, Ron and Harry on their own, and on the run.

As someone who has never read the books, I always feel like there are stories hinted at that are never fully realized in the movies, and this one is no exception. Dumbledore's mysterious past is referenced, but left in the background. There were hints to movies past, from mention of the Basilisk in Chamber of Secrets, to the Sword of Gryffindor, and the golden snitch from the first quiddich game.

The actors only get better with age as you get the feeling Emma Watson, Daniel Radcliffe and Rupert Grint are as comfortable in their characters shoes as they are in their own. Radcliffe especially flexes his acting chops with several scenes of intensity in a CGI heavy scene. Ralph Fiennes has a more commanding performance than the last movie, playing the dark lord himself, and Helena Bonham Carter shows her normal crazy side in a rather brutal scene involving Watson's Hermoine.

This movie shows it's no longer for kids with torture, death, and a pretty hot scene involving Harry and Hermoine. While there are several bright spots in the series, Goblet of Fire being my favorite, this has to be lower on the list for me. The grayness in the movie, meant to enforce the weight of the world left me depressed. There were some amazing, beautiful, dramatic scenes, but at 2 hours and 36 minutes, I started to notice the length at times, specifically in the middle.

With the action packed beginning and the dramatic end, littered with just a hint of humor, like scene with multiple Harry's, or any time they change shape, the middle, with all its scenery, and emotion packed dialogue dragged. It seemed they just teleported from one beautiful location to another without any point or purpose with tidbits of swords and the origins of magic spread throughout their travels, with the radio spreading news of death in the background the whole way.

Overall, any Harry Potter fan will be flocking to see this movie no matter what I say, and the movie will set box office record after box office record, but in the end, I don't think this will be my favorite. With the grim feeling, and depressing backdrop, this movie won't beg for the repeated viewings the others will. Either way, Harry is more than worth your time. It's beautiful, wonderfully dramatic, with a hint of humor and some nicely done action. See it; if for nothing else, to see the buildup to the ending we've all waited for since meeting that young boy all those years ago.

EDITORS NOTE: This also appeared on Creative Loafing's website HERE and SpoilerTV's website HERE. Check out the comments from these great communities.

Movie Review - Faster - Starring Dwayne Johnson

There was a scene in a movie called The Rundown, where famed action star turned governor Arnold Schwarzenegger wishes upcoming action star Dwayne Johnson good luck in passing, as a sort of passing of the torch to the next great action star. No longer The Rock, Johnson took the torch and did movies like the Tooth Fairy. Faster looks to be a return to form for the great action star, but will it be everything we wanted? Well, it's not what we expected.

Faster involves three characters, all having a bit of a connection with a bank heist turned double-cross, resulting in Johnson's brothers death. As the movie begins, we see Johnson get out of jail and making a B-line to those who killed his brother. We also meet a rich boy turned hitman, only looking for a challenge in life, and finding one in his latest hit; Johnson's character, and finally, Billy Bob Thornton's cop character, trying to hunt down the murderer of several men before more are killed.

First off, this is not what I expected from the action packed trailer. The movie was not nearly as much action as it is a suspense movie with guns, and lots and lots of shots of Dwayne Johnson looking stern. The movie seemed to be a series of scenes involving either Johnson driving to his next hit, or the quick, in and out hit itself, with really very little else. The action shots seemed really off, with director George Tillman Jr. (Men of Honor) going with a shaky cam style with lots and lots of quick cuts.

The idea on whether Johnson's character should kill the people involved with his brother's death is one the movie likes to play with. Instead of some movies showing the soon-to-be victims as total D-Bags in an effort to make the audience feel better about their impending doom, the movie shows them as family men; fathers and husbands. This makes every hit more tension filled and more ethically murky. Sure, we are reminded of the events that lead to Johnson's brother's death, but then we are shown a good, reformed, apologetic guy. This movie uses this to great effect in one scene involving Lost's Mr. Ecko (Adewale Akinnuoye-Agbaje), where the murderer turned priest wants nothing but forgiveness, and the back and forth between the two is incredible, with the debate on whether he should be executed or not.

The character of the rich mogul turned hitman is terrible, and has nothing to do with the story. It involves a guy similar to Johnson's characters moral struggle on whether to pull the trigger, although with different reasons. Either way, the character does very little, and has a totally anti-climactic ending. Thornton's drug using cop is an interesting character, however, and his ties to the murder is interesting, as he plays a cop looking for retirement. He's partnered with Carla Gugino, and as such, makes a good, and very murky character in a movie filled with them.

If you were looking for a good action movie involving a great '71 Chavelle, a promising action star, some gorgeous women and Billy Bob Thornton, then you will be disappointed. If you go in with little expectations, you will get a movie with some great scenes chained together in a movie with sloppy action shots, a stern-looking Dwayne Johnson and a great scene with Mr. Ecko. Overall, it's more of a rent then a movie theater event.

Disney done with Fairy Tales? Please no

In a terrifying article from /Film, they quote Disney's head of animation as saying "Tangled will be the last fairy tale produced by Disney’s animation group for the foreseeable future." The article goes on to question whether fairy tale stories are still relevant, along with looking at some of the previous Disney films that haven't exactly rattled the box office cage. While all this is true, this can't happen.

First off, I am not sure if "Disney Animation" and "Pixar Studios" which Disney owns are considered the same thing, which could mean that all Fairy Tale creatures, both benevolent and and benign will be handled by Pixar, as apposed to Disney. However the possible astrix goes, this is a dark day indeed.

Some of the greatest cinematic memories I have from my childhood involve Disney. I mean, you had the classics like 101 Dalmatians, and Little Mermaid, and Beauty and the Beast, and my personal favorite Lion King, and Aladdin, amongst so many others. It's a staple of youth, and to not add any new ones is silly. These movies are like the theme parks themselves, they take you to another world of magic, and wonder, and can make anyone, no matter the age feel like a kid, and while I'm not talking about the end of that per se, it sure feels like it.

Now, the article also has a Facebook exert saying that it's a bunch of bologna, but the quote, if you trust the L.A. Times, came from somewhere, which means the idea is being tossed around, and I don't like treasured cinematic movies like Disney fairy tales being toyed with. Do you?

WTF news of the week - Abraham Lincoln comes to the big screen

Sadly, I'm not talking about the adaptation of the book Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter. I'm instead talking about a rather bizarre project, helmed by Stephen Spielberg, doing a biopic on the 16th president. According to Yahoo, Spielberg had Liam Neeson cast as the $5 bill guy, but with Neeson dropping out after years of inactivity, it seems Daniel Day-Lewis is cast.

Am I the only person that doesn't see it? I mean, I guess he could look sort of like him, but I don't know if I care to see him as the president, let alone a biopic of the guy. While Lincoln's presidency is one of the more famous in history, I just don't know how they would make it interesting.

I'm not hating on the film before it's started, nor am I saying it will be boring, and with Spielberg helming the film, if it ever gets off the ground, it certainly has a good director at the helm, but from the little I've read, I'm left totally uninterested.

What about you, would you like to see an Abraham Lincoln biopic? And what about good old' Daniel Day-Lewis as Lincoln?

p.s. yes, I used Abraham Lincoln from Star Trek as the image. What of it?